Janet, a head engineer, is preparing for an initial presentation of a new project to executives.
She begins by meeting with each member of her team. Everyone goes deep into the details. She takes it all in. By the end, she has fifty pages of notes.
She wants to be thorough. She wants to be clear.
Where her preparation went off track:
She captured ground-level detail instead of starting with the 30,000-foot view.
She tried to include everything instead of defining what matters most for decision makers.
She expanded the conversation instead of directing it.
She now has the task of turning 50 pages into 8 slides.
She is now at risk of explaining, rather than guiding a decision.
When communication starts with problem, risk, cost, and priority, clarity builds quickly. Janet believes sheโs being thorough, but in reality, sheโs made the message harder to act on.
One of several solutions:
Ask each team member for the one or two most important points. Let the technical detail support those pointsโnot lead them. Now the detail strengthens the message. It doesnโt compete with it.
๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ต๐ฆ๐ค๐ฉ๐ฏ๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ญ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ฏ๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ฑ๐ด ๐ฉ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ง๐ช๐ณ๐ด๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ?